- To inform the Board of national initiatives that relate to its current proposals on early childhood mathematics education, algebra, and undergraduate education.
- To strengthen/focus MSEB’s proposals in early childhood education, algebra and undergraduate education.
- To advise the Center for Education on the design and focus of its Congressionally-mandated Teacher Education Study as it relates to mathematics.
- To frame the issues around student assessment and accountability systems and their influence on the teaching and leaning of mathematics and determine where MSEB might productively enter this territory.
|
|
|
|
Thursday, May 12th
|
7:30 – 9:30
|
Dinner
|
|
|
|
|
Mendocino Grille and Wine Bar
2917 M Street, NW
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, May 13th Open Session
|
8:00 – 8:30
|
Continental Breakfast
|
|
|
|
|
|
8:30 – 8:45
|
Welcome
|
Marge Petit
|
|
|
|
|
8:45 – 9:00
|
Framing the Meeting
|
David Mandel
|
|
|
|
|
9:00 – 9:30
|
Report of the Executive Committee Meeting
|
Marge Petit
|
|
|
|
|
9:30 – 10:30
|
Congressionally-mandated Teacher Education Study
- Where might mathematics most appropriately fit into this study?
- What are the critical questions about the education of teachers of mathematics and in what ways, if any, are they different than the questions for other el/sec teachers?
- How does this study relate to the proposed MSEB study on undergraduate education?
- Is there a piece of the Center study that the Board can undertake? |
Lisa Towne
|
|
|
|
|
10:30 – 10:45
|
Break
|
|
|
|
|
|
10:45 – 12:15
|
ED’s Secondary Mathematics Initiative
- How might ED shape this initiative so it increases the odds that it will meet its goals?
- How might the proposed study on algebra be framed so that in time it might contribute to the design of ED’s investments in mathematics?
- What might MSEB also do in the short term do inform this initiative? |
Patricia Ross – ED
|
|
|
|
|
12:15 – 1:00
|
Lunch
|
|
|
|
|
|
1:00 – 2:30
|
Early Childhood Initiative
- How might the needs of Title I, Head Start and NICHD shape the scope and substance of the proposed MSEB study?
- Should this study around the transition from pre-school to school be divided into two initiatives and, if so, which should occur first? |
Jacqueline Jackson – ED, Doug Clements – SUNY Buffalo, Sharon Griffin and Kevin Miller
|
|
|
|
|
2:30 – 2:45
|
Break
|
|
|
|
Closed Session
|
|
2:45 – 3:00
|
Bias and Conflict of Interest Review
|
Marty Orland
|
|
|
Open Session
|
|
3:00 – 4:30
|
Undergraduate Education
- How can the MSEB study best build on and complement work already completed at NSF and elsewhere?
- A brilliant study usually isn’t sufficient to provoke change in academe. What do we need to do before, during and after the study to increase the odds that its findings gain traction? |
Daniel Goroff – Harvard, Jim Lewis, Don Saari and Nancy Sattler
|
|
|
|
|
4:30 – 5:30
|
Program Development Groups
- Early childhood
- Algebra
- Undergraduate Education |
|
|
|
|
|
5:30
|
Adjourn
|
|
|
|
Dinner on your own
|
|
|
|
|
|
Saturday, May14th Open Session
|
8:00 – 8:30
|
Breakfast
|
|
|
|
|
|
8:30 – 10:30
|
Mathematics Assessment
- What is the current state of affairs with regard to mathematics assessment?
- Are there critical aspects about the interrelationship between practice and assessment where we have no hard evidence….and what are they? |
Marge Petit, Jeremy Kilpatrick and Jan de Lange
|
|
|
|
|
10:30 – 10:45
|
Break
|
|
|
|
|
|
10:45 – 11:45
|
Discussion of Other MSEB Priorities
|
Marge Petit
David Mandel
|
|
|
|
|
11:45
|
Adjourn – Box lunches will be available
|
|
|
Subscribe to e-newsletters |
Feedback | Back to Top