The National Academies: Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering and Medicine
National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine
National Academy of Engineering National Research Council
Read 2800+ Reports Online Free Current Projects Publications Directories Site Map Feedback
Exhibition & Cultural Programs
ARTS Home
Exhibitions
Concerts
Other Events
Permanent Collection
National Academies Arts Listserv
Contact Us


JPG Image

JPG Image

An exhibition organized by the National Academy of Sciences

Visionary Anatomies and the Great Divide
Part II, Anatomy is Us

(from the exhibition catalogue, available for download for free)

Part I: Introduction
This section: Part II:
Anatomy is us

Part III:
Playing with death; fun with science
Part IV:
Getting real: The new aesthetics of scientific illustration
Part V:
Our cadavers, ourselves, or the return of the anatomical repressed

Let’s begin by stating the obvious: We think of ourselves as anatomical beings. Anatomy is our inner reality: Anatomy is us. In greater or lesser detail we all carry around with us an anatomical image of self — even if we haven’t formally studied anatomy — a pocket map that divides us into regions and terrains, with internal place names and borders. And this anatomical self-image has a history — which is the history of anatomical representation — a long history of collaboration and negotiation between anatomists, artists, engravers, patrons, printers, and readers. Until the invention of the X ray, sonograms, MRIs and the like, the only way to see into ourselves was through the dissection of dead human beings. The dissected cadaver was our mirror.

Early modern anatomists peered into that mirror—and made faces. A spirit of play pervaded the anatomy of Vesalius and his predecessors and successors. They earnestly investigated our structure and functions, tried to accurately describe and represent the body, but they also sought to amuse and entertain and morally instruct and amaze students and colleagues and patrons and

 


each other, in a captivating charming sort of way. They were a feisty bunch, constantly challenging and abusing each other, trying to outdo each other with flashier dissections and bigger and more expensive books, filled with more beautiful and artful and witty and outrageous illustrations of cadavers in silly or provocative poses. Anatomists were performers, showmen, when they did their dissections and delivered their lectures in the pit of the anatomical theater, for audiences that included the local aristocracy, magistrates, and the clergy, and their showmanship carried over to their illustrated publications, and to their museums and specimens.

 

Fig. 2. Pietro [Berrettini] da Cortona (artist, 1596-1669), Luca Ciamberlano (engraver?, c.1580-1641), Tabulae anatomicae... (Rome, 1741), pl. 16. Copperplate engraving, National Library of Medicine. This extravagant plate, an early work by baroque artist-architect Pietro da Cortona, shows a dissected man holding up an anatomical mirror. The floating heads are copied from Vesalius’s 1543 De Human Corporis Fabrica.

Part I: Introduction
Part II: Anatomy is us
Next Section: Part III: Playing with death; fun with science

Part IV: Getting real: The new aesthetics of scientific illustration
Part V: Our cadavers, ourselves, or the return of the anatomical repressed

© 2004 Michael Sappol

Return to "Visionary Anatomies" main page

National Academies Home | National Academies Press | Current Projects | Publications | Directories | Search | Site Map | Feedback
National Academy of Sciences | National Academy of Engineering | Institute of Medicine | National Research Council
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement