|
|
|
|
8:30 a.m.
|
Welcome
|
|
|
Link to session video
|
|
|
• Introduction of Committee Members. Jean Moon, Study Director, Committee on Large-Scale Reform in K-12 STEM Education.
|
|
|
|
|
• Welcome on behalf of the National Science Foundation (NSF). Barbara Olds, Deputy Assistant Director (Acting), Directorate for Education and Human Resources
|
|
|
|
|
• Welcome on behalf of the National Research Council. Martin Storksdieck, Board Director, Board on Science Education (BOSE).
|
|
|
|
|
• Setting out the work of the day. Mary Kay Stein, Chair, Committee on Large-Scale Reform in K-12 STEM Education, University of Pittsburgh.
|
Bio
|
|
8:45 - 10:15 State-Based Reform: Historical Context and Overview
|
Link to session video
|
|
|
Committee Member: Patrick Shields, SRI International
|
Bio
|
Slides
|
|
|
Panel Members:
|
|
|
|
|
Margaret Goertz, University of Pennsylvania
|
Bio
|
|
|
|
Brenda Turnbull, Policy Studies Associates
|
Bio
|
|
|
|
Michael Knapp, University of Washington-Seattle
|
Bio
|
|
|
|
• Introduction: A brief history of state-focused K-12 STEM reform efforts of the past 30 years, including an explication of the choices and constraints policy makers and practitioners face in designing and implementing large-scale STEM reforms and a brief synthesis of lessons learned from previous efforts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• Response/Q&A from Audience
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10:15-10:30 Workshop Break
|
10:30 – 12:00 Role of Government, Networks, and Markets in Large-Scale Reform
|
Link to session video
|
|
|
Committee Members: Brian Rowan, University of Michigan
|
Bio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Burns, Ohio STEM Learning Network
|
Bio
|
Slides
|
|
|
Laura Hamilton, RAND Corporation
|
Bio
|
Slides
|
|
|
Robert Slavin, Success for All Foundation
|
Bio
|
Slides
|
|
|
• Introduction: An overview of the role of state departments of education, inter-organizational networks, and market-based organizations in promoting STEM reform, including the reform efforts typically conducted by each organizational type along with the advantages and disadvantages of each.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
• Response/Q&A from Audience
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12:00 – 1:00 Working Lunch – Participants continue in discussion
|
1:00 – 2:30 Perennial Challenges in State-Focused, Large-Scale STEM Reform
|
Link to session video
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeanne Century, University of Chicago
|
Bio
|
Slides
Handout
|
|
|
Mary Kay Stein, University of Pittsburgh
|
|
Slides
|
|
|
Iris Weiss, Horizon Research, Inc.
|
Bio
|
Slides
|
|
|
Session Discussants:
|
|
|
|
|
Margaret Goertz, University of Pennsylvania
|
|
|
|
|
William Penuel, SRI International
|
Bio
|
|
|
|
The session will begin with a focus on building the will and capacity for broad, deep, and enduring impact in the process of large-scale K-12 STEM reform. Committee members will present cases on capacity building and discuss them with the workshop audience. Committee members and discussants will reflect on lessons learned about capacity building in the context of STEM reforms.
|
|
|
|
|
Response/Q&A from Audience
|
|
|
2:30 – 2:45 Workshop Break
|
|
|
2:45 – 4:15 Increasing Attention to Evidence: A Non-Governmental Approach to Scaling-Up
|
Link to session video
|
|
|
Committee Member: Tom Corcoran, Columbia University
|
Bio
|
Paper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carl Wieman ,The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
|
Bio
|
|
|
|
William Penuel, SRI International
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Slavin, Success for All Foundation
|
|
|
|
|
A brief history of the challenges and tensions around taking the technical educational core of education (instruction, curriculum and assessment) as well as the professional culture in which instructional practice occurs (roles, norms, and relationships) to scale. Exploration of these challenges will include issues of instructional authority and use of evidence.
|
|
|
|
|
• Panelist Remarks and Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
• Response/Q&A from Audience
|
|
|
4:15 to 5:00 Summary and Reflections
|
Link to session video
|
|
|
Session Leader: Mary Kay Stein, Chair, Committee on Large-Scale Reform in K-12 STEM Education, University of Pittsburgh
|
|
|
|
|
• Identification and Discussion of Major Ideas and Themes across Workshop Sessions
|
|
|
|
|
• Audience Reflection and Discussion
|
|
|
5:00 PM Adjourn
|