|
|
|
|
|
The National Academies, Board on Testing and Assessment
and The National Academy of Education
BEST PRACTICES FOR STATE ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS
Workshop 2 Agenda
April 6-7, 2010
Washington, DC
|
|
|
TUESDAY, APRIL 6
|
|
|
8:45 am
|
Workshop Registration Desk Open
|
9:15 am
|
Opening Remarks
|
VIDEO
|
Stuart Elliott, Director, Board on Testing and Assessment
|
|
|
Judith Rizzo, Executive Director and CEO, James B. Hunt Jr. Institute for Educational Leadership and Policy
|
|
|
9:30 am
|
Goals for the Workshop
|
|
|
Diana Pullin, Boston College, Workshop Steering Committee Chair
|
|
|
Session I. Developing Coherent Systems, Implementing Innovative Assessments
|
|
|
|
|
Issues to Address:
|
|
|
- What does it mean to have a coherent system of assessments, with vertical, horizontal, and developmental coherence? Why is a coherent system important? What advantages does it offer?
|
|
|
- What are the different purposes of assessment and what assessment strategies best suit each purpose? How can the information provided by different forms of assessment be used to guide instruction, improve student learning, and evaluate effectiveness of teachers and schools for accountability purposes?
|
|
|
- What is involved in moving to a coherent system of assessment that incorporates multiple assessment types? What examples of such systems exist (nationally and internationally)?
|
|
|
- How can assessment of higher level thinking skills and deeper understandings be incorporated into a coherent system of assessments? What examples are currently being tried or considered?
|
|
|
|
9:45
|
Coherent System of Assessments
Moderators: Diana Pullin & Rebecca Maynard
|
VIDEO
|
|
|
|
Presenter: Joan Herman, CRESST, Workshop Steering Committee
|
Presentation
|
|
|
10:30-10:45
|
Break
|
|
|
|
10:45
|
Moderated Discussion: Policy Perspective
|
VIDEO
|
|
|
|
Panelists:
|
|
|
|
Roy Romer, College Board
|
|
|
|
Ed Roeber, Michigan State University
|
Presentation
|
|
|
11:30
|
Audience discussion
|
|
|
|
|
12:00-1:00
|
Working Lunch
|
|
|
|
1:00
|
Reconvene to continue Session I
|
VIDEO
|
Moderated Discussion: Research and Practice
Moderators: Diana Pullin & Dirk Mattson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Panelists:
|
|
|
|
Linda Darling Hammond, Stanford
|
Presentation
|
|
|
Tony Alpert, Oregon Department of Education
|
Presentation
|
|
|
Marc Tucker, National Center for Education and the Economy
|
Presentation
|
|
|
|
2:00
|
Audience Discussion
|
|
|
|
2:30-2:45
|
Break
|
|
|
Session II. Issues to Consider with Innovative Assessments
|
|
|
|
|
Issues to Address
|
|
|
- Innovative assessments pose challenges with respect to item development, administration, scoring, equating, and other technical issues. What are these challenges and how can they be addressed? How can we ensure that scores obtained from innovative assessments are reliable and valid?
|
|
|
- What issues need to be considered in using innovative assessment approaches with special populations?
|
|
|
- How can we ensure that these students have the opportunity to learn the material/ skills needed for assessments that measure deeper understandings and higher order thinking skills?
|
|
|
2:45
|
Ensuring that Innovative Assessments Provide Reliable and Valid Information
|
VIDEO
|
Moderators: Scott Marion & Mark Wilson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presenter: Rebecca Zwick, UC Santa Barbara and ETS
|
Presentation
|
|
|
3:15
|
Moderated Discussion: Special Populations Perspectives
|
VIDEO
|
|
|
|
Panelists:
|
|
|
|
Robert Linquanti, WestEd
Martha Thurlow, National Center on Education Outcomes
|
Presentation
Presentation
|
|
|
4:00
|
Moderated Discussion: Policy and Practice Perspectives
|
|
|
Panelists:
Joe Wilhoft, Washington Department of Education
Deborah Sigman, California Department of Education
|
|
|
|
4:45
|
Audience Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
5:00
|
Closing Remarks for Day 1
|
|
VIDEO
|
Gene Wilhoit, Council of Chief State School Officers
Diana Pullin
|
|
|
|
5:15
|
Adjourn Day 1
Reception
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 7
|
Session III. Strategies for Using Results from a Coherent System to Inform Instructional Decision Making
|
|
|
Issues to Address
|
|
|
- How can assessments best be used to guide instruction?
|
|
|
- What changes can be made to content standards, assessment tasks, and reports of assessment results to make them more useful for instruction?
- What role can innovative assessment approaches play in guiding instruction?
|
|
|
- What structures and supports need to be in place? What training do teachers need in order to effectively use assessment information?
|
|
|
8:30
VIDEO
|
Strategies for Using Assessment to Guide Instruction
Moderators: Joan Herman & Mark Wilson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presenter: Linda Darling-Hammond, Stanford
|
Presentation
|
|
|
|
9:15
|
Moderated Discussion: Researcher Perspective
|
VIDEO
|
|
|
|
|
Presenter:
|
|
|
|
Margaret Heritage, CRESST
|
Presentation
|
|
|
Karin Hess, National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment
|
Presentation
|
|
|
10:15-10:30
|
Break
|
|
|
|
10:30
|
Moderated Discussion: Policy maker, Practitioner Perspectives
|
VIDEO
|
Panelists:
Teri Siskind, South Carolina Department of Education
|
|
|
Peg Cagle, LA Unified School District, California Teachers Advisory Council
|
Presentation
|
|
|
|
11:15
|
Audience Discussion
|
|
|
11:45-12:45
|
Working Lunch
|
|
|
Session IV. The Role of Technology
|
|
|
Issues to Address
|
VIDEO
|
- What role can technology play in the implementation of innovative assessment strategies?
|
|
|
- What role can technology play in the scoring and reporting of innovative assessments?
|
|
|
- What role can technology play in making assessments and assessment results more useful for instruction?
|
|
|
12:45
|
Technology and Innovative Assessment
|
VIDEO
|
Moderators: Rebecca Maynard & Dirk Mattson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presenter: Randy Bennett, ETS
|
Presentation
|
|
|
1:15
|
Policy maker, Practitioner Perspective
|
VIDEO
|
Panelists:
Wendy Pickett, Delaware Department of Education
Tony Alpert, Oregon Department of Education
|
|
|
2:15-2:30
|
Break
|
|
|
Session V. Synthesis and Extension of Ideas
|
|
|
2:30
|
Aggregating Information from Different Sources
|
VIDEO
|
Issues to Address
|
|
|
- How can multiple types of assessment evidence be used and aggregated to inform summative judgments?
|
|
|
- How can this information be aggregated and used to evaluate students, teachers, and schools?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators: Diana Pullin & Scott Marion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presenter: Laurie Wise, HumRRO
|
Presentation
|
|
|
3:15
|
Moderated Discussion with full steering committee
|
|
|
4:00
|
Closing Remarks
|
|
|
Diana Pullin
|
|
|
4:15
|
Adjourn Workshop
|
|
|