|
|
|
Please note that the presentations below may be subject to copyright restrictions of the individual presenters.
|
|
|
|
8:00 am
|
Working Breakfast (Discuss Plans for the Day)
|
8:30 am
|
Welcome and Workshop Goals
|
|
|
Nancy Tippins, Valtera Corporation
|
8:45 am
|
The O*NET Content Model
|
|
|
Moderator:
Richard Froeschle, Texas Workforce Commission
|
|
|
Guiding Questions for the Session:
• What are the current strengths and weaknesses in the content model?
• What improvements would you suggest to provide more accurate, reliable or more current information or to make it more useful?
• Which current or potential future uses of the O*NET would these improvements support, and how would it support these uses?
• What are the potential advantages and/or disadvantages of the proposed improvements, in terms of cost-effectiveness, currency and validity?
• In general terms, how would your recommended changes be made? What difficulties might be encountered? |
8:50 am
|
Critique of O*NET Content Model and Survey Methodology
|
|
|
Robert J. Harvey, Virginia Polytechnic Institute
|
Presentation
Paper 1
Paper 2
|
9:20 am
|
Questions, Discussion
|
9:40 am
|
Perspectives on the O*NET Content Model
|
|
|
Marilyn Silver, JBS Associates
|
Presentation
|
|
|
Erich Dierdorff, DePaul University
|
Presentation
|
10:15 am
|
Questions, Discussion
|
10:40 am
|
Break
|
10:55 am
|
Perspectives on the O*NET Content Model (continued)
|
|
|
Michael Handel, Northeastern University
|
Presentation
The Content Model: Strengths and Limitations
|
|
|
Fred Morgeson, Michigan State University
|
Presentation
|
11:25 am
|
Questions, Discussion
|
11:55 am
|
Working Lunch (continued discussion)
|
12:55 pm
|
Methodological Issues
|
|
|
Moderator:
Ann Marie Ryan, Michigan State University
|
|
|
Guiding questions for the session:
• What are the current strengths and weaknesses in the survey, sampling, and data development methods?
• What improvements are planned to provide more accurate, reliable, or more current information?
• Which current or potential future uses of the O*NET would these improvements support, and how would it support these uses?
• What tradeoffs would be involved in proposed improvements, in terms of validity, usefulness, and cost?
• In general terms, how would your recommended changes be made? What difficulties might be encountered? |
1:00 pm
|
Current Survey and Sampling Methods and Planned Improvements
|
|
|
Michael Penne, RTI
|
Presentation
Survey & Sampling Questions
Deviance Testing Procedures
National Center for O*NET Response re Disposition Code Outcomes
National Center for O*NET Response re Statistics and Survey Methods
|
|
|
Marcus Berzofsky, RTI (by speakerphone)
|
1:15 pm
|
Questions, Discussion
|
1:45 pm
|
Data Sources: Roles of Job Incumbents and Job Analysts
|
|
|
Suzanne Tsacoumis, HumRRO
|
Presentation
Response to RJ Harvey Criticism
|
2:00 pm
|
Questions, Discussion
|
2:30 pm
|
Break
|
2:45 pm
|
Reuse and Usability of O*NET Data
|
|
|
Moderator:
Kerry Levin, Westat, Inc.
|
2:45 pm
|
Improving Usability of the O*NET
|
|
|
Scott Butler, The Usability Team
|
Presentation
|
3:00 pm
|
Enabling Reuse for O*NET Data
|
|
|
Elizabeth Sadler, University of Virginia
|
Presentation
Report and Recommendations on Web 2.0 and Social Software
|
3:15 pm
|
Questions, Discussion
|
3:45 pm
|
Adjourn Public Session
|
