The National Academies: Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
Current Operating Status
CORE HOMEPAGE

ABOUT CORE

FOCUS OF CORE

CORE MEETINGS, WORKSHOPS & PRODUCTS

RELATED NRC EFFORTS


National Research Council
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education
Center for Education

Committee on Research in Education

WORKSHOP AGENDA

Peer Review of Education Research Grant Applications
Implications, Considerations, and Future Directions
February 25-26, 2003

The National Academies
500 Fifth Street, NW
Room 100
Washington, DC

NOTE: This is an unedited verbatim transcript of the Workshop on Peer Review of Education Research Grant Applications: Implications, Considerations, and Future Directions prepared by CASET Associates and is not an official report of National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, or National Research Council (collectively “National Academies”). Opinions and statements included in the transcript are solely those of the individual persons or participants at the conference, and are not necessarily adopted or endorsed or verified as accurate by The National Academies.

Please note that the presentations below may be subject to copyright restrictions of the individual presenters.

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 25

   

8:30 a.m.

Welcome & Goals for Workshop

 

Lauress Wise, Chair, Committee on Research in Education & President, HumRRO

 

Lisa Towne, Study Director, Committee on Research in Education,
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council

   

9:00 a.m.

Historical Context for Grants Peer Review

         
 

Edward Hackett, Arizona State University

Bio

Remarks

Presentation

 

Q&A

     
   

10:15 a.m.

Education Research and Peer Review: A Perspective from the Institute of Education Sciences

         
 

Grover (Russ) Whitehurst, U.S. Department of Education

Bio

Remarks

 
 

Q&A

   

11:00 a.m.

Goals and Purposes of Grants Peer Review: Perspectives from Investigators

         
 

Hilda Borko, University of Colorado

Bio

Remarks

 
 

Penelope Peterson, Northwestern University

Bio

Remarks

 
 

Kenneth Dodge, Duke University

Bio

Remarks

 
 

Milton Hakel, Bowling Green State University

Bio

Remarks

 
 

Edward Redish, University of Maryland

Bio

Remarks

 
 

Q&A

   

1:45 p.m.

Peer Review Models: Perspectives from Funding Agencies

         
 

Finbarr (Barry) Sloane, National Science Foundation

Bio

Remarks

 
 

Steven Breckler, National Science Foundation

Bio

Remarks

 
 

Brent Stanfield, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Bio

Remarks

Presentation

 

Susan Chipman, Office of Naval Research

Bio

Remarks

Presentation

 

Louis Danielson, U.S. Department of Education

Bio

Remarks

Presentation

 

Q&A

   

4:30 p.m.

Selecting and Training Peers

         
 

Teresa Levitin, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Bio

Remarks

Presentation

 

Brent Stanfield, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Bio

Remarks

Presentation

 

Q&A

 

WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 26

   

8:30 a.m.

Report on Strengthening the Standards: An Evaluation of OERI Grants Peer Review

         
 

Diane August, August and Associates

Bio

Remarks

Presentation

 

Penelope Peterson, Northwestern University

Bio

Remarks

 
 

Q&A

   

10:15 a.m.

The Reliability of Peer Review for Grant Submissions

         
 

Dominic Cicchetti, Yale University

Bio

Remarks

Presentation

         

11:15 a.m.

Wrap Up Discussion

     
         
 

Members of the Committee on Research in Education
Speakers
Audience

     

RSS News Feed | Subscribe to e-newsletters | Feedback | Back to Top