|
Panel on Reputational Measures and Data Presentation
This panel focused on:
- a critique of the method of measuring reputation used in the past study,
- an examination of alternative ways of measuring scholarly reputation,
- the type of preliminary data that should be collected from institutions and programs that will be the most helpful for linking with other data sources (e.g., citation data) in the compilation of the quantitative measures;
- the possible incorporation of the industrial, governmental, and international respondents into a reputational assessment measure; and
In the process of their investigation they addressed issues such as:
- The halo effect
- The advantage of large programs and per capita measures
- The extent of rater knowledge about programs
- Alternative ways to get at reputation
- Accounting for institutional mission
PANEL MEMBERS
Jonathan R. Cole, Ph.D., Co-Chair
Provost & Dean of Faculties
John Mitchell Mason Professor of the University
Columbia University
Paul Holland, Ph.D., Co-Chair
Frederic M. Lord Chair in Measurement and Statistics
Educational Testing Service
John I. Brauman, Ph.D.
J.G. Jackson & C.J. Wood Professor of Chemistry
Cognizant Dean for the Natural Sciences
Stanford University
Lawrence B. Martin, Ph.D.
Dean of the Graduate School,
Associate Provost for Analysis and Planning, and
Director of International Programs
State University of New York at Stony Brook
Kathleen Carley, Ph.D.
Professor of Social and Decision Sciences,
Director of the Center for Computational Analysis of
Social and Organizational Systems
Carnegie-Mellon University
Louis Maheu, Ph.D.
Dean and Vice President of Graduate Studies
University of Montreal
Faculté des études supérierures
David J. Schmidly, Ph.D.
President
Texas Tech University
Donald B. Rubin, Ph.D.
Chair and Professor of Statistics
Harvard University 
|
|
Subscribe to e-newsletters |
Feedback | Back to Top